- This topic is empty.
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
51 PANACEA
LENGTH
51' 0"
BEAM
14' 8"
50 EVOLUTION
LENGTH
47' 6"
BEAM
13' 8"
475 PANACEA
LENGTH
47' 6"
BEAM
13' 8"
438 EVOLUTION
LENGTH
43' 0"
BEAM
12' 8"
43 NOMAD
LENGTH
42' 7"
BEAM
12' 8"
427 NOMAD FE
LENGTH
42' 7"
BEAM
12' 8"
41 VALOR
LENGTH
41' 8.5"
BEAM
11' 9"
409 VALOR
LENGTH
40' 0"
BEAM
11' 1"
41 PANACEA
LENGTH
40' 0"
BEAM
11' 9"
41 NOMAD
LENGTH
40' 0"
BEAM
11' 9"
407 NOMAD FE
LENGTH
40' 0"
BEAM
11' 1"
375 NOMAD SE
LENGTH
37' 6"
BEAM
10' 6"
375 NOMAD FE
LENGTH
37' 6"
BEAM
10' 6"
345 VALOR
LENGTH
34' 6"
BEAM
10' 6"
345 NOMAD SE
LENGTH
34' 6"
BEAM
10' 6"
345 NOMAD FE
LENGTH
34' 6"
BEAM
10' 6"
327 NOMAD
LENGTH
32' 7"
BEAM
9' 10"
327 VALOR
LENGTH
32' 7"
300 NOMAD
LENGTH
30' 0"
BEAM
9' 6"
477 Evolution
LENGTH
47’ 6”
BEAM
13’ 8”
I am debating repower options for my 289WA. currently it has the original pair of 225 Saltwater series 2 Yamaha’s.
I would love four strokes but I am concerned about the additional weight a pair of 4 strokes would add.
I also am curious if there’s any experience with changes in performance with a modern pair 225 or 200 2 strokes and what performance numbers might be.
I am much more concerned about efficency in teh 25-35 knt range than top speed.
Thank you for your input and help.
-Matt